I trattati del Gelnhausen e dell' Ameilh il dibattito sul concilio come soluzione allo Scisma d’Occidente

Giovanni De Riggi

doi:10.3989/hs.1999.v51.i104.584

I trattati del Gelnhausen e dell' Ameilh il dibattito sul concilio come soluzione allo Scisma d’Occidente

Authors

Giovanni De Riggi Universidad Gregoriana. Roma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/hs.1999.v51.i104.584

Abstract

This article examines the card. Ameilh's treatises and the parish priest in Worms, Konrad von Gelnhausen's one, about Council's doctrine as a solution to the Schism of the West (1378-1417). These are two treatises, two different ecclesiologies. Gelnhausen sets against the Council's ecclesiology a rather oligarchical one, the Ameilh's ecclesiology. The heart of the speech is the doctrine of the Church as «congregatio fidelium», which is identified by Ameilh like the Roman Church itself —Pope and Cardinal's Council—, according to Gelnhausen, the only legal organ which represents the Universality of the Church.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1999-12-30

How to Cite

De Riggi, G. (1999). I trattati del Gelnhausen e dell’ Ameilh il dibattito sul concilio come soluzione allo Scisma d’Occidente. Hispania Sacra, 51(104), 447–486. https://doi.org/10.3989/hs.1999.v51.i104.584

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 51 No. 104 (1999)

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.

All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.

Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.